1. The Open Hand
Although our moral compass, which has served us quite adequately through recorded history, is persistent in its ability to direct us (a distinct ethnic subgroup of the wider group commonly referred to as Caucasians) figuratively north, while we toiled on the peripheries of existence — making our world a ‘better place’ —
the magnetic forces of the human planet were forever realigned. The paradigm of what it means to be Us — the northern trajectory of our essential character — is now the flawless exemplum of self-slaughter. In substance, what was once a cult of Life has, due to extraneous meddling with the imperceptible energy that guides our ethical needle point, been clandestinely transformed into an occultation of Death. The reason for subverting our intrinsic nature can be explained simply and without much obfuscation, though the mechanisms and methods encouraged and practiced by the subverters in order to reach their objective are incredibly intricate and devilishly subtle.
The reason our compass now directs us south (towards hell — the road to which, as everyone knows, is paved with good intentions) while still proclaiming a northerly bearing,
is because a competing human group intends on destroying us. The word “destroy” is deliberately employed not for the purposes of hyperbole or to cause panic, it is used purely for the sake of brevity. The ambition of our enemy is the complete and irreversible eradication of our race; our genetic inheritance. When confronted with a very capable foe and such high stakes, the rationale is not, as such, of any meaningful relevance. It will be assumed that the reader is not a newcomer to this topic and so he will be spared any further details. It may be valuable, however, to here elucidate on the specific techniques utilised by our enemy in his near successful obliteration of us. By identifying some of the procedures by which we have been brought low, it could feasibly assist us in a keener understanding of ourselves and the constitution of our moral compass.
It is conceivable that an unusual trait in the moral matrix of the White race — an altruistic quirk which has unequivocally been our greatest flaw in the modern era — might well be consciously adapted and progressively pressed into service to our eternal genetic benefit.
Our congenital ‘Aryan Morality’ can be described as a type of open-handed social idiosyncrasy; the open hand representing honest intent (i.e., the absence of concealed weapons or brooding hostility) rather than an acquisitive, intemperate, or venal gesture. In flagrant contrast to our many human competitors, we wear our designs, ambitions, and aspirations on our sleeves, whether we present the open hand of conciliation, caution, and salutation, or the clenched fist of rage and impending violence. It is therefore logical to assume that in certain sensitive circumstances our race does not enjoy a psychological advantage and often finds itself at a distinct disadvantage in matters of non-martial — and especially international — dealings. The history of the latter half Western civilisation goes some way in corroborating this thesis.
In the wider context of the animal kingdom, various forms of deception and camouflage have been legitimised by the veracity of continued existence. Most of the planet’s fauna has survived because of crypsis (the ability to avoid detection by others organisms, whether they be predator or prey) and the concomitant natural selection processes of the ecological environment. It appears that the White race possesses a significant deficiency in
‘emotional crypsis,’ a result of which is the divulging of too much conceptual data — unintentional though this may be — to its human competitors, some of whom are capable of elementary exploitation for their own immediate benefit, while others have succeeded in completely and callously manipulating individuals and, it seems, the entire genetic collective itself.
Our peculiar proclivity to pity the seemingly poor and oppressed bottommost echelons of humanity is not, one may reasonably conjecture, exclusive and discriminating. The ambivalent treatment of impoverished Whites when compared with non-Whites — especially in their native countries — is dramatically conspicuous when balancing the tremendous fiscal levels of governmental ‘foreign aid’ rendered to ‘developing’ non-White nations (as well as
ubiquitous and lucrative televised fund-raising events, such as Comic Relief in the United Kingdom) and the lack of meaningful institutionalised help for White homeless people. Similar appears to be the case in relation to White ‘indentured servants’ (who were, according to Michael A. Hoffman II in his excruciatingly well-documented They Were White and They Were Slaves, convicted of being destitute and deported as infinitely cheap labour to the British colonies where they could expect to be worked to death or to perish due to the unfamiliar climatic conditions) and non-White ‘slaves.’
The congenital chivalric phenomenon, coined by Barbara Oakley, et al., as ‘pathological altruism,’ fails to explain why the White race in particular, engages in comparable magnanimous activities, the passion for which is dependent upon an ethnical sliding scale. Pathological altruism is defined as:
“A person who sincerely engages in what he or she intends to be altruistic acts, but who harms the very person or group he or she is trying to help, often in unanticipated fashion; or harms others; or irrationally becomes a victim of his or her own altruistic actions.”
This explanation of a known manifestation of ‘good intent,’ does nothing to elucidate the racial complexity of — what could be called, if the reader hankered for a catchy slogan — ‘underdogism,’ or what has already been identified above as open-handed social idiosyncrasy. OHSI can be classified as a dementia when its persistent observance acts to undermine, and ultimately destroy, those so afflicted. The suicidal liberality of the White race has taken it to the brink of extinction and so has its defiant innocence of human biological reality.
Integrity is the impulse that unclenches the Aryan hand: the obverse of the mendacious alien fist or begging palm. Only the Aryan faces the world with open
hands, his face to the wind and his soul exposed to eternity. The Aryan has not erected incidental barriers between his innate virtue and the living environment, and it is because of this unrefined connection that he has tamed and conserved in equal measures; exploiting while being himself exploited; unleashing as he is instinctively leashed.
The open-handed nature of our ethical code was epitomised by a Weltanschauung movement in Germany which publicly flourished following the aftermath of the First World (European) War. In National Socialism – ‘Nazism’ – we find several interesting elements on which to ruminate, the first being ostensibly symbolic:
1. The Roman Salute
The significance of the adoption of this visual signal by the NSDAP is threefold:
a) It corresponds to a greeting, an oath, or a formal gesture of respect, as was reportedly common during the romantic days of Aryan antiquity and Rome, b) it is enthused with connotations of power and authority, again, suggestive of the Roman Empire, and c) it is an example of an ‘open-handed’ salutation/gesticulation, accentuating the absence of concealed weapons or brooding hostility, as described above.
Germany lost the propaganda war because its wartime leaders refused to adopt a strategy of total deception. Of ‘The Big Lie,’ Joseph Goebbels, Reich Minister for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, is reported to have said:
“The essential English leadership secret does not depend on particular intelligence. Rather, it depends on a remarkably stupid thick-headedness. The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous.”
The genres of politics, law, and mass communication, which incorporate essentially un-Aryan practices, such as The Big Lie–and even the excessive narrative ‘spin’ we are subjected to today–border on the alien and are motifs we frequently find instinctively repugnant; they are essentially non-White in nature and draw influences from, for one example, the Jewish Talmud, specifically a declaration known as the Kol Nidre. This religiously important proclamation asserts that:
“All vows we are likely to make, all oaths and pledges we are likely to take between this Yom Kippur and the next Yom Kippur, we publicly renounce. Let them all be relinquished and abandoned, null and void, neither firm nor established. Let our vows, pledges and oaths be considered neither vows nor pledges nor oaths.”
Against this kind brazen duplexity, our race has yet to develop an effective defensive mechanism.
According to the peerless revisionist historian, David Irving, it was not until July 1940 that the Luftwaffe commenced its bombing of London, an act preceded by Churchill’s order to bomb Berlin. The reason was, as professed by Irving, expressed by the American Ambassador, Joseph P. Kennedy:
“I want the Germans to start bombing London as early as possible because this will bring the Americans into the war when they see the Nazis’ frightfulness, and above all it will put an end to this awkward and inconvenient peace movement that’s afoot in my own Cabinet and among the British population.”
To the Aryan mind, war is explicit. Conflict is between men and with their full knowledge. Opposing armies adhere to unspoken directives and orthodox codes of conduct. Attacking civilians for the primary purpose of goading statesmen into authorising military action is intrinsically abhorrent to us. Only minds contaminated by a foreign agent (principally the perfidious promises and assurances of our eternal enemy) can be made immune to illicit warfare.
Hitler’s peace offers of 1939, 1940, and 1941 were rejected in favour of an illimitably costly conflict and the eventual demand of an unconditional surrender to which Germany had little choice but to suffer. And it is with almost disbelief that we remember the treatment of the German deputy leader who, on 10th May 1941, flew alone to Scotland with intentions of instigating peace talks with the British government. Rudolf Hess was, to our great national shame, summarily arrested and imprisoned for the rest of his life, eventually dying in 1987.
Throughout a protracted period in his modern history, European man attempted to ‘civilise’ the non-White human world. For around four hundred years, and up until the beginning of the Great War (later to be chronicled as World War One due to another “Great War”), European colonies were formally established in practically every populous region of planet Earth. Rather than extirpate the natives, however, these White pioneers enlisted the indigenous peoples in their undertakings. But in time, the European’s will to dominate and govern ebbed and the newly demarcated landmasses were bestowed upon the descends of the original inhabitants, though not without wanton discord and bloodshed.
Since the social revolution which occurred immediately following World War Two, the aboriginals of Europe’s former colonies have materialised in the West in their tens of millions. It is perhaps that these humans arrived with women and children in tow and without overt weapons that the reaction to this invasion was so very muted, although it is likely the product of several interconnected factors:
The Second World War was fought on behalf of the controllers of international finance capital by four combatants: Germany (and the other Axis nations), which opposed the aforementioned — non-militarised — force, as well as its armoured twin: communism; Britain (and her colonies), which was seduced and ensnared into a war it could not win; America, which was seduced and ensnared into a war it did not want to fight; and communist Russia (and her colonies), which welcomed war and a opportunity to extend its dominion. Were it not for the determination of the international money force, national socialism and communism would have clashed until Germany, inevitably, emerged victorious. But because of the nefarious, fungal, influence of the money powers, Britain and America came galloping to the aid of our enemies.
The result of the Second World War was the nominal ascension of America — in thrall to the money powers — at the expense of Britain; the eradication of National Socialism as a conventional political and ideological alternative; and the replacement of ruthless Soviet-style communism with a corrupt Judaeo-American-style corporate capitalism concealed beneath the pretence of an incompatible and dysgenic ochlocracy.
Because the world had been ‘freed from the tyranny of national socialism,’ nationalism — it’s jingoistic variant having been deployed without mercy during the war years — became an idea tarnished with the blood of millions, including six million allegedly gassed Jews, and the new masters of the West quickly began to inculcate that nationalism was a vestigial ‘evil.’ This paved the way for mass non-White immigration into Europe and all formally White nations.
The affects of this indoctrination have been incredibly potent and it is only in recent years that establishment-approved so-called ‘civic’ nationalism (i.e., non-racial ‘patriotism,’ which is primarily concerned with the inability of Muslims to integrate into an increasingly mono-cultural society) has been officially endorsed. This is, however, merely a single example of the execrable and incessant propaganda washing over our folk like baptismal water.
Due to our ‘open-handed’ nature, we can offer little in the way of protection against the agitation propaganda of our enemies: the insidious fashion and lifestyle trends; pro-miscegenation guidance across the media spectrum; ‘anti-Nazism;’ televised racial role reversal and misinformation; prejudice news reporting, especially in relation to crime; the falsification of anthropology and human biology; affirmative action incentives; and the intense conditioning of our helpless children.
Our elected representatives, and subsequent governments, are complicit in this exercise in White genocide. Within the ideological crucible of national administration, only the most mendacious and treacherous politicians are primed, promoted, and positioned in front of the bewildered ‘equalised’ voters. Every institution is marching to the beat of the same diabolical drum and the cogs in these vast machines are mesmerised by the reverberations of ethnic annihilation.
The combination of an exclusive open-handed Aryan ethic and an inclusive universalist morality, today represents our Achilles heel. Not only is our altruistic nature easily exploitable, we are supremely vulnerable to such conniving due to our inborn sense of honesty, justice, and honour. In short, if we cannot initiate wide-ranging cognitive change we will go unspectacularly extinct in the centuries to come – that is, unless our open hand can be made an open fist.