The New Tribe: Way of the Open Fist – Part I

RomanSalute1

From: The Way of the Open Fist – Part I

1. The Open Hand

Although our moral com­pass, which has served us quite ade­quately through recorded his­tory, is per­sis­tent in its abil­ity to direct us (a dis­tinct eth­nic sub­group of the wider group com­monly referred to as Cau­casians) fig­u­ra­tively north, while we toiled on the periph­eries of exis­tence — mak­ing our world a ‘bet­ter place’ —

the mag­netic forces of the human planet were for­ever realigned. The par­a­digm of what it means to be Us — the north­ern tra­jec­tory of our essen­tial char­ac­ter — is now the flaw­less exem­plum of self-​slaughter. In sub­stance, what was once a cult of Life has, due to extra­ne­ous med­dling with the imper­cep­ti­ble energy that guides our eth­i­cal nee­dle point, been clan­des­tinely trans­formed into an occul­ta­tion of Death. The rea­son for sub­vert­ing our intrin­sic nature can be explained sim­ply and with­out much obfus­ca­tion, though the mech­a­nisms and meth­ods encour­aged and prac­ticed by the sub­vert­ers in order to reach their objec­tive are incred­i­bly intri­cate and dev­il­ishly subtle.

The rea­son our com­pass now directs us south (towards hell — the road to which, as every­one knows, is paved with good inten­tions) while still pro­claim­ing a northerly bear­ing,

is because a com­pet­ing human group intends on destroy­ing us. The word “destroy” is delib­er­ately employed not for the pur­poses of hyper­bole or to cause panic, it is used purely for the sake of brevity. The ambi­tion of our enemy is the com­plete and irre­versible erad­i­ca­tion of our race; our genetic inher­i­tance. When con­fronted with a very capa­ble foe and such high stakes, the ratio­nale is not, as such, of any mean­ing­ful rel­e­vance. It will be assumed that the reader is not a new­comer to this topic and so he will be spared any fur­ther details. It may be valu­able, how­ever, to here elu­ci­date on the spe­cific tech­niques utilised by our enemy in his near suc­cess­ful oblit­er­a­tion of us. By iden­ti­fy­ing some of the pro­ce­dures by which we have been brought low, it could fea­si­bly assist us in a keener under­stand­ing of our­selves and the con­sti­tu­tion of our moral compass.

It is con­ceiv­able that an unusual trait in the moral matrix of the White race — an altru­is­tic quirk which has unequiv­o­cally been our great­est flaw in the mod­ern era — might well be con­sciously adapted and pro­gres­sively pressed into ser­vice to our eter­nal genetic benefit.

Our con­gen­i­tal ‘Aryan Moral­ity’ can be described as a type of open-​handed social idio­syn­crasy; the open hand rep­re­sent­ing hon­est intent (i.e., the absence of con­cealed weapons or brood­ing hos­til­ity) rather than an acquis­i­tive, intem­per­ate, or venal ges­ture. In fla­grant con­trast to our many human com­peti­tors, we wear our designs, ambi­tions, and aspi­ra­tions on our sleeves, whether we present the open hand of con­cil­i­a­tion, cau­tion, and salu­ta­tion, or the clenched fist of rage and impend­ing vio­lence. It is there­fore log­i­cal to assume that in cer­tain sen­si­tive cir­cum­stances our race does not enjoy a psy­cho­log­i­cal advan­tage and often finds itself at a dis­tinct dis­ad­van­tage in mat­ters of non-​martial — and espe­cially inter­na­tional — deal­ings. The his­tory of the lat­ter half West­ern civil­i­sa­tion goes some way in cor­rob­o­rat­ing this thesis.

In the wider con­text of the ani­mal king­dom, var­i­ous forms of decep­tion and cam­ou­flage have been legit­imised by the verac­ity of con­tin­ued exis­tence. Most of the planet’s fauna has sur­vived because of cryp­sis (the abil­ity to avoid detec­tion by oth­ers organ­isms, whether they be preda­tor or prey) and the con­comi­tant nat­ural selec­tion processes of the eco­log­i­cal envi­ron­ment. It appears that the White race pos­sesses a sig­nif­i­cant defi­ciency in

‘emo­tional cryp­sis,’ a result of which is the divulging of too much con­cep­tual data — unin­ten­tional though this may be — to its human com­peti­tors, some of whom are capa­ble of ele­men­tary exploita­tion for their own imme­di­ate ben­e­fit, while oth­ers have suc­ceeded in com­pletely and cal­lously manip­u­lat­ing indi­vid­u­als and, it seems, the entire genetic col­lec­tive itself.

Our pecu­liar pro­cliv­ity to pity the seem­ingly poor and oppressed bot­tom­most ech­e­lons of human­ity is not, one may rea­son­ably con­jec­ture, exclu­sive and dis­crim­i­nat­ing. The ambiva­lent treat­ment of impov­er­ished Whites when com­pared with non-​Whites — espe­cially in their native coun­tries — is dra­mat­i­cally con­spic­u­ous when bal­anc­ing the tremen­dous fis­cal lev­els of gov­ern­men­tal ‘for­eign aid’ ren­dered to ‘devel­op­ing’ non-​White nations (as well as

ubiq­ui­tous and lucra­tive tele­vised fund-​raising events, such as Comic Relief in the United King­dom) and the lack of mean­ing­ful insti­tu­tion­alised help for White home­less peo­ple. Sim­i­lar appears to be the case in rela­tion to White ‘inden­tured ser­vants’ (who were, accord­ing to Michael A. Hoff­man II in his excru­ci­at­ingly well-​documented They Were White and They Were Slaves, con­victed of being des­ti­tute and deported as infi­nitely cheap labour to the British colonies where they could expect to be worked to death or to per­ish due to the unfa­mil­iar cli­matic con­di­tions) and non-​White ‘slaves.’

The con­gen­i­tal chival­ric phe­nom­e­non, coined by Bar­bara Oak­ley, et al., as ‘patho­log­i­cal altru­ism,’ fails to explain why the White race in par­tic­u­lar, engages in com­pa­ra­ble mag­nan­i­mous activ­i­ties, the pas­sion for which is depen­dent upon an eth­ni­cal slid­ing scale. Patho­log­i­cal altru­ism is defined as:

“A per­son who sin­cerely engages in what he or she intends to be altru­is­tic acts, but who harms the very per­son or group he or she is try­ing to help, often in unan­tic­i­pated fash­ion; or harms oth­ers; or irra­tionally becomes a vic­tim of his or her own altru­is­tic actions.”[4]

This expla­na­tion of a known man­i­fes­ta­tion of ‘good intent,’ does noth­ing to elu­ci­date the racial com­plex­ity of — what could be called, if the reader han­kered for a catchy slo­gan — ‘under­do­gism,’ or what has already been iden­ti­fied above as open-​handed social idio­syn­crasy. OHSI can be clas­si­fied as a demen­tia when its per­sis­tent obser­vance acts to under­mine, and ulti­mately destroy, those so afflicted. The sui­ci­dal lib­er­al­ity of the White race has taken it to the brink of extinc­tion and so has its defi­ant inno­cence of human bio­log­i­cal reality.

Integrity is the impulse that unclenches the Aryan hand: the obverse of the men­da­cious alien fist or beg­ging palm. Only the Aryan faces the world with open

hands, his face to the wind and his soul exposed to eter­nity. The Aryan has not erected inci­den­tal bar­ri­ers between his innate virtue and the liv­ing envi­ron­ment, and it is because of this unre­fined con­nec­tion that he has tamed and con­served in equal mea­sures; exploit­ing while being him­self exploited; unleash­ing as he is instinc­tively leashed.

The open-​handed nature of our eth­i­cal code was epit­o­mised by a Weltan­schau­ung move­ment in Ger­many which pub­licly flour­ished fol­low­ing the after­math of the First World (Euro­pean) War. In National Social­ism – ‘Nazism’ – we find sev­eral inter­est­ing ele­ments on which to rumi­nate, the first being osten­si­bly symbolic:

1. The Roman Salute

The sig­nif­i­cance of the adop­tion of this visual sig­nal by the NSDAP is threefold:

a) It cor­re­sponds to a greet­ing, an oath, or a for­mal ges­ture of respect, as was report­edly com­mon dur­ing the roman­tic days of Aryan antiq­uity and Rome[5], b) it is enthused with con­no­ta­tions of power and author­ity, again, sug­ges­tive of the Roman Empire, and c) it is an exam­ple of an ‘open-​handed’ salutation/​gesticulation, accen­tu­at­ing the absence of con­cealed weapons or brood­ing hos­til­ity, as described above.

2. Pro­pa­ganda

Ger­many lost the pro­pa­ganda war because its wartime lead­ers refused to adopt a strat­egy of total decep­tion. Of ‘The Big Lie,’ Joseph Goebbels, Reich Min­is­ter for Pub­lic Enlight­en­ment and Pro­pa­ganda, is reported to have said:

“The essen­tial Eng­lish lead­er­ship secret does not depend on par­tic­u­lar intel­li­gence. Rather, it depends on a remark­ably stu­pid thick-​headedness. The Eng­lish fol­low the prin­ci­ple that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of look­ing ridicu­lous.”[6]

The genres of politics, law, and mass communication, which incorporate essentially un-Aryan practices, such as The Big Lie–and even the excessive narrative ‘spin’ we are subjected to today–border on the alien and are motifs we frequently find instinctively repugnant; they are essentially non-White in nature and draw influences from, for one example, the Jewish Talmud, specifically a declaration known as the Kol Nidre. This religiously important proclamation asserts that:

“All vows we are likely to make, all oaths and pledges we are likely to take between this Yom Kip­pur and the next Yom Kip­pur, we pub­licly renounce. Let them all be relin­quished and aban­doned, null and void, nei­ther firm nor estab­lished. Let our vows, pledges and oaths be con­sid­ered nei­ther vows nor pledges nor oaths.”[7]

Against this kind brazen duplex­ity, our race has yet to develop an effective defen­sive mechanism.

3. Blitzkrieg

Accord­ing to the peer­less revi­sion­ist his­to­rian, David Irv­ing, it was not until July 1940 that the Luft­waf­fe commenced its bomb­ing of Lon­don, an act pre­ceded by Churchill’s order to bomb Berlin. The rea­son was, as pro­fessed by Irv­ing, expressed by the Amer­i­can Ambas­sador, Joseph P. Kennedy:

“I want the Ger­mans to start bomb­ing Lon­don as early as pos­si­ble because this will bring the Amer­i­cans into the war when they see the Nazis’ fright­ful­ness, and above all it will put an end to this awk­ward and incon­ve­nient peace move­ment that’s afoot in my own Cab­i­net and among the British pop­u­la­tion.”[8]

To the Aryan mind, war is explicit. Con­flict is between men and with their full knowl­edge. Oppos­ing armies adhere to unspo­ken direc­tives and ortho­dox codes of con­duct. Attacking civil­ians for the pri­mary pur­pose of goad­ing states­men into autho­ris­ing mil­i­tary action is intrin­si­cally abhor­rent to us. Only minds con­t­a­m­i­nated by a for­eign agent (prin­ci­pally the per­fid­i­ous promises and assur­ances of our eter­nal enemy) can be made immune to illicit warfare.

4. Diplo­macy

Hitler’s peace offers of 1939, 1940, and 1941 were rejected in favour of an illim­itably costly con­flict and the even­tual demand of an uncon­di­tional sur­ren­der to which Ger­many had lit­tle choice but to suf­fer. And it is with almost dis­be­lief that we remem­ber the treat­ment of the Ger­man deputy leader who, on 10th May 1941, flew alone to Scot­land with inten­tions of instigating peace talks with the British gov­ern­ment. Rudolf Hess was, to our great national shame, sum­mar­ily arrested and impris­oned for the rest of his life, even­tu­ally dying in 1987.

Through­out a pro­tracted period in his mod­ern his­tory, Euro­pean man attempted to ‘civilise’ the non-​White human world. For around four hun­dred years, and up until the begin­ning of the Great War (later to be chron­i­cled as World War One due to another “Great War”), Euro­pean colonies were for­mally estab­lished in prac­ti­cally every pop­u­lous region of planet Earth. Rather than extir­pate the natives, how­ever, these White pio­neers enlisted the indige­nous peo­ples in their under­tak­ings. But in time, the European’s will to dom­i­nate and gov­ern ebbed and the newly demar­cated land­masses were bestowed upon the descends of the orig­i­nal inhab­i­tants, though not with­out wan­ton dis­cord and bloodshed.

Since the social rev­o­lu­tion which occurred imme­di­ately fol­low­ing World War Two, the abo­rig­i­nals of Europe’s for­mer colonies have mate­ri­alised in the West in their tens of mil­lions. It is per­haps that these humans arrived with women and chil­dren in tow and with­out overt weapons that the reac­tion to this inva­sion was so very muted, although it is likely the prod­uct of sev­eral inter­con­nected factors:

The Sec­ond World War was fought on behalf of the con­trollers of inter­na­tional finance cap­i­tal by four com­bat­ants: Ger­many (and the other Axis nations), which opposed the afore­men­tioned — non-​militarised — force, as well as its armoured twin: com­mu­nism; Britain (and her colonies), which was seduced and ensnared into a war it could not win; Amer­ica, which was seduced and ensnared into a war it did not want to fight; and com­mu­nist Rus­sia (and her colonies), which wel­comed war and a oppor­tu­nity to extend its domin­ion. Were it not for the deter­mi­na­tion of the inter­na­tional money force, national social­ism and com­mu­nism would have clashed until Ger­many, inevitably, emerged vic­to­ri­ous. But because of the nefar­i­ous, fun­gal, influ­ence of the money pow­ers, Britain and Amer­ica came gal­lop­ing to the aid of our enemies.[9]

The result of the Sec­ond World War[10] was the nom­i­nal ascen­sion of Amer­ica — in thrall to the money pow­ers — at the expense of Britain; the erad­i­ca­tion of National Social­ism as a con­ven­tional polit­i­cal and ide­o­log­i­cal alter­na­tive; and the replace­ment of ruth­less Soviet-​style com­mu­nism with a cor­rupt Judaeo-​American-​style cor­po­rate cap­i­tal­ism con­cealed beneath the pre­tence of an incom­pat­i­ble and dys­genic ochlocracy.

Because the world had been ‘freed from the tyranny of national social­ism,’ nation­al­ism — it’s jin­go­is­tic vari­ant hav­ing been deployed with­out mercy dur­ing the war years — became an idea tar­nished with the blood of mil­lions, includ­ing six mil­lion allegedly gassed Jews, and the new mas­ters of the West quickly began to incul­cate that nation­al­ism was a ves­ti­gial ‘evil.’ This paved the way for mass non-​White immi­gra­tion into Europe and all for­mally White nations.

The affects of this indoc­tri­na­tion have been incred­i­bly potent and it is only in recent years that establishment-​approved so-​called ‘civic’ nation­al­ism (i.e., non-​racial ‘patri­o­tism,’ which is pri­mar­ily con­cerned with the inabil­ity of Mus­lims to inte­grate into an increas­ingly mono-​cultural soci­ety) has been offi­cially endorsed. This is, how­ever, merely a sin­gle exam­ple of the exe­crable and inces­sant pro­pa­ganda wash­ing over our folk like bap­tismal water.

Due to our ‘open-​handed’ nature, we can offer lit­tle in the way of pro­tec­tion against the agi­ta­tion pro­pa­ganda of our ene­mies: the insid­i­ous fash­ion and lifestyle trends; pro-​miscegenation guid­ance across the media spec­trum; ‘anti-​Nazism;’ tele­vised racial role rever­sal and mis­in­for­ma­tion; prej­u­dice news report­ing, espe­cially in rela­tion to crime; the fal­si­fi­ca­tion of anthro­pol­ogy and human biol­ogy; affir­ma­tive action incen­tives; and the intense con­di­tion­ing of our help­less children.

Our elected representatives, and subsequent governments, are complicit in this exercise in White genocide. Within the ideological crucible of national administration, only the most mendacious and treacherous politicians are primed, promoted, and positioned in front of the bewildered ‘equalised’ voters. Every institution is marching to the beat of the same diabolical drum and the cogs in these vast machines are mesmerised by the reverberations of ethnic annihilation.

The combination of an exclusive open-handed Aryan ethic and an inclusive universalist morality, today represents our Achilles heel. Not only is our altruistic nature easily exploitable, we are supremely vulnerable to such conniving due to our inborn sense of honesty, justice, and honour. In short, if we cannot initiate wide-ranging cognitive change we will go unspectacularly extinct in the centuries to come – that is, unless our open hand can be made an open fist.

–S.P.D.

[4] Oak­ley, Knafo, and McGrath; Patho­log­i­cal Altru­ism, Oxford Uni­ver­sity Press, 2012.
[5] Cicero’s report of a young Octa­vian pledged an oath to Julius Cae­sar: “Although that youth [Cae­sar Octa­vian] is pow­er­ful and has told Antony off nicely: yet, after all, we must wait to see the end. But what a speech! He swore his oath with the words: ‘So may I achieve the hon­ours of my father!’ And at the same time he stretched out his right in the direc­tion of his statue.”
[6] Die Zeit ohne Beispiel; Zen­tralver­lag der NSDAP; Munich; 1941, pp. 364369.
[7] Philip Birn­baum; High Hol­i­day Prayer Book; Hebrew Pub­lish­ing Com­pany; NY, 1951.
[8] From David Irvind’s address to the 1983 Inter­na­tional Revi­sion­ist Con­fer­ence, as reported by Theodore J. O’Keefe; Insti­tute for His­tor­i­cal Review.
[9] Early pub­lic evi­dence of this can be found in the head­line of the Lon­don Daily Express of 24th March 1933, which pro­nounced: “Judea Declares War on Ger­many — Jews of All the World Unite — Boy­cott of Ger­man Goods — Mass Demon­stra­tions.” Accord­ing to the Express arti­cle:
“The whole of Israel through­out the world is unit­ing to declare an eco­nomic and finan­cial war on Ger­many. The appear­ance of the Swastika as the sym­bol of the new Ger­many has revived the old war sym­bol of Judas to new life. Four­teen mil­lion Jews scat­tered over the entire world are tight to each other as if one man, in order to declare war against the Ger­man per­se­cu­tors of their fel­low believ­ers.
“The Jew­ish whole­saler will quit his house, the banker his stock exchange, the mer­chant his busi­ness, and the beg­gar his hum­ble hut, in order to join the holy war against Hitler’s people.”
[10] Not the least of which was the loss of mil­lions of our most coura­geous young men.
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s