The Bare Necessities – Part 1: Jews

Jwe1) Jews

“In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played… a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.” ~ Winston Churchill: Zionism verus Bolshevism; a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people, Sunday Herald, 1920.

We know all about the Jews (or whatever they really are*) and rather than constantly concerning ourselves with their actions–past and present; at home and abroad–we can now properly draw a single conclusion from our long history together: we cannot trust Jews. Other than this succinct and enduring maxim, we should not submit to fancy and luxuriate in a preoccupation with Jews.

Hatred of Jews, although understandable, achieves nothing of real worth. However, we must always bear in mind our maxim, we cannot trust Jews, and treat them with stable, steadfast suspicion. If being extremely suspicious of Jews make us anti-Semitic, then so be it–because we should be generally wary of all Semitic peoples–but this designation does not automatically bestow upon us anti-Zionist credentials.

In terms of my own core principles, I would consider myself to be pro-Zionist, in the sense that I fervently believe that all Jews should relocate to Israel and stay there, without enjoying further aid and comfort from the West – unless it is in the interests of White people to provide these things. What Jews do to Palestinians, or other non-Whites, is not our concern.

The subject of Jews is not something that the average novice to our movement should be exposed to, it is in fact the most difficult topic in our syllabus not only to fully comprehend, but also to accept. Once we have gained the trust of a potential tribalist, then we can broach the “Jewish Question” and frame it in the context of our struggle: to ensure the survival, proliferation, and development of our kind, no matter the cost.

*for the record I class a “Jew” as any person who refers to themselves as such as is accordingly accepted by their peers.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “The Bare Necessities – Part 1: Jews

  1. AAA says:

    The thing is, to me –and many others[1]– Zionism is not just founded in nationhood and a desire for a homeland (as a nationalist I of course agree with this), it is also a political, internationalist, supremacist position; a global fifth column controlling Western governments, an entryist and expansionist parasite.
    .
    I’ve heard this “I’m pro-Zionist because I’d like all Jew to leave the Occident and return to Israel” refrain many times and I again must ask: Israel has been in existence since 1948. How many Jews have left us and gone there? Why are there still ghettos of diaspora Jews displaced throughout the Occident? Why, after almost 70 years since the inception of Israel, are we still battling with Jews in our lands?
    .
    As you can see, Zionism is much more than just the securement of a homeland. This tribe is going nowhere: it can effect much more influence by remaining put; thus it has.
    .
    Is this issue a vital British national interest? Make your own judgements.[2]
    .
    As for Jews being self-identifying –“as any person who refers to themselves as such”– well, is this ‘membership card’ not the same as transvestites and transsexuals also self-identifying by ignoring the reality of Nature and thus being ‘morally entitled’ to use female amenities? ‘Jew’ is not a jacket one dons and removes at the impulse of whim. It’s in the blood and transcends religion.
    .
    .
    [1] http://nationalvanguard.org/2014/12/the-ideological-roots-of-zionism/
    [2] Justice for Palestinians: a Vital British National Interest – Martin Webster https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sxFXjCbtVE&list=PL3C04E1E38ABC2EE4

    Like

  2. ragsmakepaper says:

    In relation to your first point, I qualified my position in this manner: “I would consider myself to be pro-Zionist, in the sense that I fervently believe that all Jews should relocate to Israel and stay there…” [sadly, I cannot add emphasis in these comments].

    Whatever the intricacies of Zionism are, the fundamental principle is that Jews have a homeland and should live there. That is the overriding credo whether it is fully implemented or not, and it is a far more realistic proposition than solving the “Jewish Problem” by exterminating them; something that no people have ever achieved. There are over eight million Jews currently living in Israel. What anti-Zionists, such as David Duke, fail to explain is that is they get their wish, and give the land back to those loveable Muslims, where are these eight million Jews going to relocate? The consequences of fruitful anti-Zionism should make a sane White man shudder.

    As for us battling with Jews for the past 70 years, I’ve not seen it. Which battle? Apart from blogging and the occasional imprisonment, there has been no battle since the Second World War and even then it was a battle between Europeans.

    Martin Webster has been involved in nationalism since my father was a boy and has achieved nothing of note–my stance may sound uncompromising but I am now no longer interested in what has failed and I am deaf to the excuses–he is also a rampant homosexual and there is an air of rumour and suspicion that surrounds him that has endured since his days as de facto leader of the NF.

    British national interests are no longer our interests; Britain is enemy occupied territory. If Jews were to move to Israel then whatever happened to Palestinians wouldn’t concern me–and shouldn’t concern any right-thinking White person–in the slightest. In fact, if it served our new, racial, British interests to arm both side, or one side, or whatever the case may be, then that is a policy we should implement.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s